2026 Asia Pacific Cost of Living

2026-01-14

Asia Pacific cost of living
Hong Kong cost of living
Singapore Cost of Living
Sydney cost of living
Shanghai cost of living
New Zealand cost of living
Seoul cost of living
Expat cost of living
expat salary
expatriate salary
salary purchasing power
cost of living allowance

Xpatulator’s Asia Pacific rankings place Hong Kong and Singapore well above the New York City benchmark, largely due to housing and high cost services, while Sydney sits marginally higher than New York City as Australia’s housing constraints continue. Chinese cities reflect a mix of moderated inflation, property sector adjustment, and currency effects that influence dollar converted costs, while New Zealand’s main centres remain relatively expensive due to housing, utilities, and scale. Currency volatility, especially for the Australian dollar, New Zealand dollar, and South Korean won, can materially change expatriate purchasing power, reinforcing the value of modelling offers using Xpatulator tools.

Xpatulator’s latest Asia Pacific city rankings show how expatriate living costs cluster around a few recurring pressures. Housing constraints dominate the top end in global finance and technology hubs. Import dependence raises day to day costs on remote islands. Currency moves against the United States dollar change the relative price of the same basket from one year to the next, even when local prices are steady. Inflation then decides whether those costs settle or compound. Xpatulator’s 2026 international inflation page, reflects a global picture in which disinflation has progressed but has not been uniform across countries or spending categories.

Most Expensive Cities in Asia Pacific 2026.svg

Hong Kong at 122.4 sits at the top of this list because accommodation remains expensive for the locations and unit sizes typically used by international professionals. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority’s linked exchange rate system holds the Hong Kong dollar within a tight band against the United States dollar, so currency has been a smaller driver than rent and services. Recent official data put consumer price inflation at around 1.2 percent year on year in late 2025, which helps explain why the index remains high largely through housing rather than broad based price acceleration.

Singapore at 117.7 combines strong demand for centrally located housing with high prices for private transport, education, and labour intensive services. Inflation has eased compared with earlier peaks, with Ministry of Trade and Industry reporting and Monetary Authority of Singapore commentary showing consumer price inflation around the low single digits in late 2025. Car ownership remains a meaningful cost line item for some assignees, and early 2026 reporting shows the certificate of entitlement premium still sitting at high levels despite periodic tender to tender moves.

Sydney at 100.7 sits just above the New York City benchmark at 100, largely because housing is tight and expensive by global standards. Australia’s inflation has cooled, with the Australian Bureau of Statistics reporting year ended consumer price inflation of 3.4 percent in November 2025, yet housing and related costs remain key contributors. Reuters polling and reporting point to ongoing upward pressure on Australian home prices through 2026, and Australia’s low rental vacancy rates reinforce the practical reality faced by relocators seeking family sized rentals.

Shanghai at 97.7 and Beijing at 87.1 sit below New York City in this set, but they are not low cost destinations for international professionals. International schooling, higher specification accommodation, and imported goods can quickly raise expatriate budgets, even where local services are cheaper. China’s property market weakness has been an important macro backdrop, with Reuters reporting on policy efforts to stabilise housing and ongoing price declines that are expected to extend into 2026. At the same time, Financial Times reporting notes the renminbi appreciated against the United States dollar in 2025, which can raise United States dollar converted costs for expatriates paid in dollars, even if local prices are subdued.

New Zealand cities follow a similar pattern of moderate headline inflation combined with expensive housing and utilities. Wellington at 94.7, Auckland at 92.4, and Christchurch at 86.7 reflect a small, geographically remote market where building costs, rents, and limited supply can dominate the expatriate basket. New Zealand inflation reached 3.0 percent year on year in the September 2025 quarter, sitting at the top of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand target band, with rent and electricity highlighted as contributors. The New Zealand dollar also moved within a broad range against the United States dollar through late 2025, which can change the relative cost for assignees paid in dollars.

Across Australia beyond Sydney, Canberra at 90.4, Perth at 88.9, Melbourne at 88.6, Brisbane at 86.1, and Adelaide at 84.3 show how the index falls as housing costs ease and commuting patterns change, while still reflecting a high cost service economy. Exchange rates matter here too. Recent data sources tracking Australian dollar movements show noticeable swings against the United States dollar into early 2026, which can materially change the converted cost for expatriates whose pay is dollar linked.

In North Asia, Taipei at 88.1 and Seoul at 85.6 reflect advanced, export led economies where housing and private services still drive the expatriate basket. Reuters reporting on Taiwan’s export strength in 2025 highlights the ongoing role of technology demand in supporting incomes and domestic cost structures. In South Korea, Reuters reported significant foreign exchange volatility in January 2026, with the won weakening and authorities signalling readiness to respond, which is relevant for expatriates paid in foreign currency or remitting abroad.

Macao in China Macao at 88.0 remains influenced by a compact housing market and a tourism led economy, while Pyongyang at 86.9 and Ashgabat at 81.8 are better understood as special cases. In highly controlled markets, expatriate cost is often driven by access to limited accommodation, imported supplies through restricted channels, and the practical cost of compliance, security, and logistics. These factors can keep expatriate baskets elevated even when local price signals are hard to observe.

Remote island locations typically carry a persistent import premium. Honiara in the Solomon Islands at 86.6 reflects freight and scale effects that raise the price of food, household items, and construction inputs. Hagatna in Guam at 83.1 sits within a United States aligned supply chain, yet distance and shipping still tend to raise retail prices for many items.

For expatriates, the commercial implication is consistent across this region. A competitive headline salary can translate into weaker salary purchasing power once rent, education, healthcare, transport, and imported goods are priced into a realistic monthly budget. Comparing cost of living differences before accepting an offer helps quantify how much disposable income will remain, and it reduces the risk of underestimating costs that are difficult to avoid once on the ground. Xpatulator’s Salary Purchasing Power Parity Calculator supports this by converting pay into comparable purchasing power and by modelling the baskets that international professionals actually fund from salary.

Use Xpatulator’s Cost of Living Calculators and Tools for informed decision making about the cost of living and the salary, allowance, or assignment package required to maintain the current standard of living.